<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">usfd</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ultrasound &amp; Functional Diagnostics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1607-0771</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9494</issn><publisher><publisher-name>RDS-Media Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24835/1607-0771-2018-4-65-76</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">usfd-147</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Ультразвуковая диагностика в акушерстве и гинекологии</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка матки с помощью компрессионной эластографии после самопроизвольных родов и операции кесарева сечения</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Strain elastography of the uterus after spontaneous labor and cesarean section</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Приходько</surname><given-names>Андрей Михайлович</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Prikhodko</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">a_prikhodko@oparina4.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Баев</surname><given-names>О. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Baev</surname><given-names>O. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Луньков</surname><given-names>С. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lunkov</surname><given-names>S. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Еремина</surname><given-names>О. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Eremina</surname><given-names>O. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гус</surname><given-names>А. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gus</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУ “Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии имени академика В.И. Кулакова” Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Приходько А.М., Баев О.Р., Луньков С.С., Еремина О.В., Гус А.И., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Приходько А.М., Баев О.Р., Луньков С.С., Еремина О.В., Гус А.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Prikhodko A.M., Baev O.R., Lunkov S.S., Eremina O.V., Gus A.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://usfd.rdsmedia.ru/jour/article/view/147">https://usfd.rdsmedia.ru/jour/article/view/147</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель исследования - определение возможности использования эластографии для оценки изменений в миометрии после родов с учетом метода родоразрешения. В исследование вошли 159 женщин в доношенном сроке беременности, из них 30 после самопроизвольных родов (контрольная группа) и 129 после операции кесарева сечения (основная группа). Из 129 кесаревых сечений 85 пациенток прооперировано в родах и 44 - до начала родов. Во всех наблю дениях течение послеродового (послеоперационного) периода было неосложненным. На первом этапе проводили ультразвуковое исследование в В-режиме. На втором этапе проводили оценку эластичности различных отделов матки (передняя стенка тела матки, рубец (перешеек), шейка матки) в реальном времени с помощью компрессионной эластографии с расчетом индекса эластичности (отношение эластичности области интереса к эластичности эталонного участка). Эталонным участком являлась задняя стенка в месте перехода в дно матки. Во всех 159 наблюдениях исследования проводили на 4-е сутки после родоразрешения, а у 26 женщин после родов и 34 женщин после кесарева сечения - через 3 мес. Ткань матки в зоне рубца имеет меньшую эластичность по сравнению с другими отделами матки как в раннем послеоперационном периоде, так и через 3 мес после родоразрешения. Особенно заметно снижение эластичности на 4-е сутки после кесарева сечения, проведенного до начала родов. В то же время через 3 мес различия в значениях индекса эластичности в области рубца между женщинами, оперированными до и во время родов, недостоверны. Другой особенностью является то, что низкая эластичность рубца сочетается с более высокой эластичностью близлежащих отделов матки (как выше (передняя стенка матки), так и ниже (шейка матки) рубца). Эластография позволяет оценить упругие характеристики миометрия и выявить особенности, специфичные для метода родоразрешения.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The aim of the study was to assess the strain elastography value in myometrium changes according to the delivery method. The study included 159 women with full-term pregnancy, 30 of them after spontaneous labor (control group) and 129 after cesarean section (main group). The cesarean section was performed during the labor in 85 patients and before the onset of labor in 44 patients. The postpartum (postoperative) period was uncomplicated in all cases. The B-mode ultrasound was performed as a first step. At the second step, the elasticity of different parts of the uterus (anterior wall of the uterus, scar (isthmus), cervix) was evaluated with real-time tissue elastography. Elasticity indices (ratio of the region of interest elasticity to the reference area elasticity) were calculated. The reference area was in the posterior wall close to the uterine fundus. In all 159 cases examinations were performed on the 4th day after delivery and additionally in 3 month after spontaneous labor in 26 women and after cesarean section in 34 women. The elasticity of the uterine tissue in the scar area was lower in compare to the other parts of the uterus in the early postoperative period and 3 months after delivery. The decrease of the elasticity was the most notable on the 4th day after prelabor cesarean section. In 3 month the differences in elasticity indices values between groups of the prelabor and intrapartum cesarean section was not significant. Another feature was the combination of the low scar elasticity with the higher elasticity of the surrounding uterine tissue. Strain elastography allows to assess the myometrium elastic proprieties and to identify signs specific to the delivery method.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ультразвуковое исследование</kwd><kwd>ультразвуковая эластография</kwd><kwd>компрессионная эластография</kwd><kwd>рубец на матке</kwd><kwd>кесарево сечение</kwd><kwd>ultrasound</kwd><kwd>ultrasound elastography</kwd><kwd>strain elastography</kwd><kwd>uterine scar</kwd><kwd>caesarean section</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Демидов В.Н. Ультразвуковая оценка состояния рубца на матке после кесарева сечения // Пренатальная диагностика. 2009. № 4. С. 291-297.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Демидов В.Н. Ультразвуковая оценка состояния рубца на матке после кесарева сечения // Пренатальная диагностика. 2009. № 4. С. 291-297.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Surapaneni K., Silberzweig J.E. Cesarean section scar diverticulum: appearance on hysterosalpingography // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008. V. 190. No. 4. P. 870-874. Doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2916.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Surapaneni K., Silberzweig J.E. Cesarean section scar diverticulum: appearance on hysterosalpingography // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008. V. 190. No. 4. P. 870-874. Doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2916.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">American College of Obstetricians and Gyne cologists. ACOG technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology No. 5: sonohysterography // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. V. 112. No. 6. P. 1467-1469. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181940892.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">American College of Obstetricians and Gyne cologists. ACOG technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology No. 5: sonohysterography // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. V. 112. No. 6. P. 1467-1469. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181940892.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maldjian C., Milestone B., Schnall M., Smith R. MR appearance of uterine dehiscence in the post-cesarean section patient // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1998. V. 22. No. 5. P. 738-741.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maldjian C., Milestone B., Schnall M., Smith R. MR appearance of uterine dehiscence in the post-cesarean section patient // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1998. V. 22. No. 5. P. 738-741.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roberge S., Boutin A., Chaillet N., Moore L., Jastrow N., Demers S., Bujold E. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect // Am. J. Perinatol. 2012. V. 29. No. 6. P. 465-471. Doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roberge S., Boutin A., Chaillet N., Moore L., Jastrow N., Demers S., Bujold E. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect // Am. J. Perinatol. 2012. V. 29. No. 6. P. 465-471. Doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garra B.S. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you // Ultrasound Q. 2011. V. 27. No. 3. P. 177-186. Doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a2138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garra B.S. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you // Ultrasound Q. 2011. V. 27. No. 3. P. 177-186. Doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a2138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Митьков В.В., Митькова М.Д. Ультразвуковая эластография сдвиговой волной // Ультра звуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2015. № 2. С. 94-108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Митьков В.В., Митькова М.Д. Ультразвуковая эластография сдвиговой волной // Ультра звуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2015. № 2. С. 94-108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Acar S., Millar E., Mitkova M., Mitkov V. Value of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis // Ultrasound. 2016. V. 24. No. 4. P. 205-213. Doi: 10.1177/1742271X16673677.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Acar S., Millar E., Mitkova M., Mitkov V. Value of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis // Ultrasound. 2016. V. 24. No. 4. P. 205-213. Doi: 10.1177/1742271X16673677.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Краснова И.А., Шишкина Т.Ю., Аксенова В.Б. Ультразвуковая эластография - критерии диагностики трубной беременности // Ультразву ковая и функциональная диагностика. 2017. № 3. С. 32-46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Краснова И.А., Шишкина Т.Ю., Аксенова В.Б. Ультразвуковая эластография - критерии диагностики трубной беременности // Ультразву ковая и функциональная диагностика. 2017. № 3. С. 32-46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гажонова В.Е., Белозерова И.С., Воронцова Н.А., Титов Д.С. Соноэластография в диагностике рака эндометрия // Журнал акушерства и гинекологии. 2014. № 1. C. 54-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Гажонова В.Е., Белозерова И.С., Воронцова Н.А., Титов Д.С. Соноэластография в диагностике рака эндометрия // Журнал акушерства и гинекологии. 2014. № 1. C. 54-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Swiatkowska-Freund M., Preis K. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives // Int. J. Womens Health. 2017. V. 21. No. 9. P. 245-254. Doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S106321.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Swiatkowska-Freund M., Preis K. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives // Int. J. Womens Health. 2017. V. 21. No. 9. P. 245-254. Doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S106321.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Swiatkowska-Freund M., Preis K. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011. V. 38. No. 1. P. 52-56. Doi: 10.1002/uog.9021.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Swiatkowska-Freund M., Preis K. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011. V. 38. No. 1. P. 52-56. Doi: 10.1002/uog.9021.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mabuchi S., Sasano T., Kuroda H., Takahashi R., Nakagawa S., Kimura T. Real-time tissue sonoelasto graphy for early response monitoring in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: preliminary results // J. Med. Ultrason. 2015. V. 42. No. 3. P. 379-385. Doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0616-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mabuchi S., Sasano T., Kuroda H., Takahashi R., Nakagawa S., Kimura T. Real-time tissue sonoelasto graphy for early response monitoring in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: preliminary results // J. Med. Ultrason. 2015. V. 42. No. 3. P. 379-385. Doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0616-6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tessarolo M., Bonino L., Camanni M., Deltetto F. Elastosonography: a possible new tool for diagnosis of adenomyosis? // Eur. Radiol. 2011. V. 21. No. 7. P. 1546-1552. Doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2064-z.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tessarolo M., Bonino L., Camanni M., Deltetto F. Elastosonography: a possible new tool for diagnosis of adenomyosis? // Eur. Radiol. 2011. V. 21. No. 7. P. 1546-1552. Doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2064-z.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Londero A.P., Schmitz R., Bertozzi S., Driul L., Fruscalzo A. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Perinat. Med. 2016. V. 44. No. 2. P. 167-178. Doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0035.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Londero A.P., Schmitz R., Bertozzi S., Driul L., Fruscalzo A. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Perinat. Med. 2016. V. 44. No. 2. P. 167-178. Doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0035.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nell S., Kist J.W., Debray T.P., de Keizer B., van Oostenbrugge T.J., Borel Rinkes I.H., Valk G.D., Vriens M.R. Qualitative elastography can replace thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration in patients with soft thyroid nodules. A systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Radiol. 2015. V. 84. No. 4. P. 652-661. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nell S., Kist J.W., Debray T.P., de Keizer B., van Oostenbrugge T.J., Borel Rinkes I.H., Valk G.D., Vriens M.R. Qualitative elastography can replace thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration in patients with soft thyroid nodules. A systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Radiol. 2015. V. 84. No. 4. P. 652-661. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Botar-Jid C.M. Cosgarea R., Bolboaca S.D., Senila S.C., Lenghel L.M., Rogojan L., Dudea S.M. Assessment of cutaneous melanoma by use of veryhigh-frequency ultrasound and real-time elastography // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2016. V. 206. No. 4. P. 699-704. Doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15182.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Botar-Jid C.M. Cosgarea R., Bolboaca S.D., Senila S.C., Lenghel L.M., Rogojan L., Dudea S.M. Assessment of cutaneous melanoma by use of veryhigh-frequency ultrasound and real-time elastography // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2016. V. 206. No. 4. P. 699-704. Doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15182.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ariji Y., Nakayama M., Nishiyama W., Ariji E. Applications of sonographic elastography to the oral and maxillofacial region // J. Radiol. Radiat. Ther. 2014. V. 2. No. 2. Р. 1049.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ariji Y., Nakayama M., Nishiyama W., Ariji E. Applications of sonographic elastography to the oral and maxillofacial region // J. Radiol. Radiat. Ther. 2014. V. 2. No. 2. Р. 1049.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khalil M.R., Thorsen P., Uldbjerg N. Cervical ultrasound elastography may hold potential to predict risk of preterm birth // Dan. Med. J. 2013. V. 60. No. 1. P. A4570.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khalil M.R., Thorsen P., Uldbjerg N. Cervical ultrasound elastography may hold potential to predict risk of preterm birth // Dan. Med. J. 2013. V. 60. No. 1. P. A4570.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sabiani L., Haumonte J.B., Loundou A., Caro A.S., Brunet J., Cocallemen J.F., D'ercole C., Bretelle F. Cervical HI-RTE elastography and pregnancy outcome: a prospective study // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015. V. 186. P. 80-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.01.016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sabiani L., Haumonte J.B., Loundou A., Caro A.S., Brunet J., Cocallemen J.F., D'ercole C., Bretelle F. Cervical HI-RTE elastography and pregnancy outcome: a prospective study // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015. V. 186. P. 80-84. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.01.016.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ami O., Lamazou F., Mabille M., Levaillant J.M., Deffieux X., Frydman R., Musset D. Real-time transvaginal elastosonography of uterine fibroids // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. V. 34. No. 4. P. 486-488. Doi: 10.1002/uog.7358.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ami O., Lamazou F., Mabille M., Levaillant J.M., Deffieux X., Frydman R., Musset D. Real-time transvaginal elastosonography of uterine fibroids // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. V. 34. No. 4. P. 486-488. Doi: 10.1002/uog.7358.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hernandez-Andrade E., Hassan S.S., Ahn H., Korzeniewski S.J., Yeo L., Chaiworapongsa T., Romero R. Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. V. 41. No. 2. P. 152-161. Doi: 10.1002/uog.12344.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hernandez-Andrade E., Hassan S.S., Ahn H., Korzeniewski S.J., Yeo L., Chaiworapongsa T., Romero R. Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. V. 41. No. 2. P. 152-161. Doi: 10.1002/uog.12344.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
